British Empire Proves Easier to Celebrate and Fight for than to Finance
Neville
Chamberlain presented his sixth (and last) consecutive Budget as Chancellor of
the Exchequer. Whilst he still fell well short of Lloyd George’s record of
eight Budgets, he had superintended Britain’s slow and painful recovery from
the worst of the world slump. His task had not, though, got any easier. Above
all the cost of rearming Britain had pushed government spending up to the unheard
of level of £855m, £57m more than in the previous year. Military spending
accounted for almost one quarter of the total. Chamberlain made an
uncharacteristic error in determining how to finance this. Assuming that
financial and business circles would share his loathing of deficit finance, he
proposed the introduction of an extra level of corporate taxation under the
name “National Defence Contribution”. It was modelled on the old Excess Profits
Duty, designed to capture business profiteering during the First World War. The
details had been poorly thought out: taxing increases in profits would fall heavily
on Britain’s classic staple industries, whose profits were only just recovering
from the ravages of the Great Slump. The more modern industries such as car
making would also suffer to some degree. The Stock Market fell heavily amidst a
widespread outcry.
The
inhabitants of London showed greater public spirit by turning out in their tens
of thousands to witness the dress rehearsal for the Coronation procession even
though it began at 6.30am on the first day of summer time. The spectacle fell
well short of the real thing. No member of the Royal family was there although
copious salutes were delivered to their imaginary presence. The troops wore normal
khaki dress and not their grand ceremonial uniforms. Civilian officials were
even detected wearing bowler hats. The state coaches were real enough.
Comments
Post a Comment